The Healthy Skeptic: Fish Oil, Bleeding, and Surgery
We’ve long been told fish oil promotes bleeding, and to stop taking omega-3s before surgery.
06/12/2017 By Craig Weatherby
You never know when you might land in emergency surgery.
And when you go under the knife, it’s critical to keep bleeding under control.
Concerns center on anticoagulant “blood thinning” drugs like Coumadin (warfarin) and several arguably superior modern counterparts such as Eliquis, Pradaxa, and Xarelto.
For decades, doctors have advised — or ordered — their patients to stop taking fish oil well before surgery, out of concern for its ability to thin blood.
Omega-3s certainly do discourage unhealthful “stickiness” among blood platelets, which helps cardiovascular health.
But do the omega-3s found in human cells and in seafood (DHA and EPA) really produce bleeding risks like those associated with pharmaceutical anticoagulants?
Danish researchers just published a comprehensive evidence review of studies about fish oil’s effects on bleeding times.
Coincidentally, Canadian researchers recently reviewed the evidence about the effects of omega-3 fish oil on surgery outcomes.
Before we scrutinize both studies, let's examine the story that led to fears about taking fish oil before surgery.
Greenland Eskimo study raised first bleeding-time fears
Bleeding time is the time it takes for your blood to coagulate when you receive a cut, whether accidental or surgical. Fears about fish oil's effects on bleeding time during surgery stemmed from a 1975 Danish study in Greenland Eskimos.
The Greenland Eskimos ate diets very high in omega-3s from seafood, with omega-3 blood levels seven to 13 times higher than average European or American levels.
While they had superior heart health, they also displayed much longer “bleeding times” than average Americans or Europeans.
Finding in Alaskan Eskimos challenged fish oil fears
A 1994 study in Alaskan Eskimos directly challenged the idea that the Greenland Eskimos’ high omega-3 levels were responsible for their long bleeding times.
Although the Alaskan Eskimos had comparably high blood levels of omega-3s, their bleeding times were more like those seen in average Americans or Europeans.
And, compared with their Greenland counterparts, the Alaskan Eskimos had much higher blood levels of omega-6 AA — which mainly comes from meats and dairy — like the AA levels seen in average Americans or Europeans.
That difference in omega-6 AA blood levels may explain why average bleeding times among Alaskan Eskimos were much shorter than average bleeding times among Greenland Eskimos.
Regardless of the reason, it no longer made sense to place blame for the Greenland Eskimos' long bleeding times on their high omega-3 levels.
But few doctors were aware of the contradictory finding in Alaskan Eskimos, good studies on fish oil and bleeding times were lacking, and evidence that fish oil can aid surgical recovery only arrived in recent years.
Recent evidence review finds no backing for fish oil fears
The first well-publicized challenge to fears about fish oil arrived in 2008, when prominent cardiac researcher William S. Harris, Ph.D., reported that he could find no supporting evidence (see Can Fish Oil Cause Bleeding Risks?).
Now, researchers at Denmark’s Aarhus University Hospital have published another evidence review, which should put the old fish oil fears to rest.
After examining 16 studies in patients undergoing heart surgery, the Danish team concluded that taking fish oil before surgery did not increase bleeding or the required amount of transfused blood (Begtrup KM et al. 2017).
They also reviewed evidence from 32 studies in healthy people, which confirmed that fish oil supplementation reduces platelet aggregation — an effect that could possibly lengthen bleeding time.
The Danes highlighted the apparently contradictory outcomes of both reviews: “As the biochemical effect of fish oil supplements in healthy subjects was not reflected in an increased bleeding risk during surgery, this systematic review does not support the need for discontinuation of fish oil supplements prior to surgery or other invasive procedures.”
Fish oil may shorten hospital stays for heart-surgery patients
Ten years back, we covered encouraging findings about the effects of fish oil in cancer-surgery patients … see Omega-3s May Enhance Post-Surgery Outcomes.
And earlier this month, scientists at Canada’s Sherbrooke University published the encouraging results of their review of evidence from studies in heart surgery patients.
The Canadian team scrutinized 19 randomized, controlled clinical trials that had collected data on the length of hospital stays and the risk of risky heart rhythms (atrial fibrillation) after heart surgery (Langlois PL et al. 2017).
In each case, the authors of the original studies had collected information about the patient’s use of supplements, including fish oil.
Most previous evidence reviews had only examined the effect of pre-surgery fish oil supplements on risky post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) — with mixed findings — rather than clinical outcomes such as length of hospital stay (LOS).
Importantly, the authors of the new review found that patients who’d been taking fish oil before surgery spent 1.4 fewer days in the hospital, and enjoyed a 22% lower rate of POAF.
As the Canadians wrote, “This updated systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that [fish oil] administered to patients undergoing cardiac surgery may be able to significantly reduce hospital LOS and the incidence of POAF.”
The Quebec-based researchers noted that patients undergoing open-heart surgery showed the most significant reductions in inflammation and rates of atrial fibrillation.
Their review found no evidence for other significant advantages among patients who took fish oil in the weeks or months before surgery, such as length of stay in intensive care units or risk of death after surgery.
Lead researcher Pascal Langlois said the findings should encourage more research on the possible benefits of taking omega-3 fish oil before heart surgery, and lay bleeding fears to rest.
Interestingly, recent studies from China and Iran found that taking omega-3 fish oil and vitamin C before surgery may produce even better outcomes (Guo XY et al. 2014; Ali-Hassan-Sayegh S et al. 2014).
Clearly, it's time to stop worrying that a daily regimen of fish oil will pose a bleeding risk during surgery. Instead, it looks like fish oil eases recovery from surgery, and should be encouraged for that reason among many others.
https://www.vitalchoice.com/article/healthy-skeptic-fish-oil-bleeding-and surgery?cohcid=0bbf03e8000000000000000000000821439f&utm_source=bronto&utm_medium=email&utm_term=GET+THE+SCOOP&utm_content=06/26/2017&utm_campaign=VC-News-6-26 2017&_bta_tid=19513038695476430382778723695946591769183589912872414028766941121704631098978613067548648192929969663751&_bta_c=hdyt8org55netj21goqdzsr05oo50
Cardiovascular Disorder, Central Nervous System, Gastrointestinal Disorder, Musculoskeletal Disorder, Renal Disorder
Most consumers do not recognize caffeine as having adverse side effects or interactions. Caffeine is present in coffee, tea and soft drinks, as well as in some bottled water, juice, frozen desserts, yogurt, chocolate, candies and some over-the-counter and prescription medicines. The average consumption of caffeine by the intake of coffee, tea and cocoa, in the United States, is approximately 139 mg/person/day, which does not include those hidden in soft drinks and other sources, which may contribute an additional 210-238 mg/day. Caffeine can cause adverse neurological, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, renal and musculoskeletal effects, which include agitation, cardiac arrhythmia, insulin resistance and increased diuresis. A case report describes a 56-year-old male with gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypercholesterolemia, mild depression, reduced libido and colitis. The subject consumed eight to nine 12-ounce cups of coffee daily and alcohol occasionally, and smoked one-half pack of cigarettes per day. He had an irregular heart rate of 54. The patient was told to reduce his caffeine intake by 50%. There was a spontaneous conversion of his atrial fibrillation with a reduction of caffeine intake. His caffeine intake was approximated to be 1,600 mg/day, over 1,400 mg more than average. Caffeine is absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract within 45-60 minutes. Ninety-five percent of caffeine's metabolism occurs by the CYP1A2 system in the liver. The major route of elimination is the kidney. The half-life of caffeine may be twice as long in caffeine-naive individuals compared with those accustomed to caffeine. Caffeine should be considered a drug. It may be an adenosine antagonist and inhibit phosphodiesterase and the mobilization of intracellular calcium from skeletal, cardiac and neuronal tissue. Lower doses of caffeine (20 mg - 200 mg) may increase energy, efficiency, self-confidence and alertness. It is postulated that the inhibition of adenosine, which is needed to inhibit neurotransmitter release and decrease the rate of firing of neurons, is blocked by caffeine, which enhances these physiologic events. Cerebral vasoconstriction occurs following caffeine consumption and may help migraines. Excess caffeine intake may cause vasodilation. Caffeine is believed to enhance excitatory transmission, which affects gamma-aminobutyric acid transmission through adenosine blockade. There is a decline in mood following overnight caffeine deprivation. Caffeine may have a cerebral protective effect and significantly reduce the incidence of Parkinson's disease. Caffeine may increase sympathomimetic activation, releasing norepinephrine, epinephrine and renin, which may result in arrhythmias. Since 1975, when filtered coffee was introduced, there has been no link between caffeine ingestion and coronary artery disease. Caffeine affects the kidneys similar to thiazide diuretics. There is increased sodium and chloride excretion. Women lose about 5 mg of calcium through the renal tubules for every 6 ounces of coffee or 24 ounces of cola consumed. Caffeine relaxes smooth muscles in the bronchial tree and increases vital capacity, as well as stimulates skeletal muscle. Caffeine can enhance anaerobic exercise. Following caffeine consumption, there is a decrease in glucose disposal and carbohydrate storage. Caffeine releases epinephrine, which can inhibit peripheral glucose uptake. Caffeine consumption may increase insulin resistance. Caffeine can alter acid and pepsin secretion within the gastrointestinal tract, causing diarrhea, nausea and heartburn. Caffeine intake should be below 250 mg/day. Withdrawal symptoms include headache, irritability, mood changes, depression, anxiety, tiredness, lack of energy and poor concentration. Education regarding caffeine should be included in lifestyle modification teaching, such as low cholesterol and low sodium diets, routine exercise, moderation in alcohol consumption, and smoking cessation.
"Is Caffeine Excess Part of Your Differential Diagnosis?" Bridle L, Remick J, Duffy E, The Nurse Practitioner, April 2004;29(4):39-44.
This comprehensive formula brings together proanthocyanidins, amino acids, vitamin C and carotenoids to provide exceptional protection against free radical damage in retinal tissue.
• N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) and reduced glutathione, promoting optimal glutathione concentrations for important antioxidant protection of the lens of the eye*
• Bilberry extract, containing anthocyanidins shown to moderate visual fatigue and to improve light to dark adjustments*
• Grape seed extract, also containing powerful anthocyanidins for enhanced antioxidant potential in the retina*
• Lutein and zeaxanthin, the only two carotenoids found in the macula. They promote the integrity and density of the macular pigment and help to maintain the health of the optical lens*
• Mixed carotenoids, providing lutein and zeaxanthin, as well as other carotenoids for antioxidant support. The antioxidant activity provides optimal protection of the macula from light*
• Vitamin C, additional antioxidant support shown to maintain ocular health*
Macular Support: Macular Support Formula is a combination of powerful antioxidants and botanicals designed to protect and support the macula, the central area of the retina responsible for sharp vision.
What is Major Autohemotherapy (MAH)? MAH is similar to an IV vitamin drip. The difference
What is DERMOZONE? DERMOZONE refers to the method of isolating a body part by surrounding
What is COLONOZONE & Rectal Ozone Insufflation? This is one of the earliest forms of